The Sport ⚽️ Channel is the author of this post Beijing 2022: In pictures, the Olympics without natural snow in the middle of industrial zones A mountain of criticism is directed at the IOC and the organizers of the Beijing Winter Olympics who pride themselves on having orchestrated “green” and “clean” Games. A white ribbon winding through the middle of arid brush: the image of the alpine ski slopes of the 2022 Olympics captured from its flight to China by the Norwegian Kjetil Jansrud could sum up the environmental "aberration" denounced by experts. This is one of the strong commitments of the organizers of the 2022 Olympics (February 4-20): the Beijing Games will be "green" and "clean", they insist, ensuring that the electricity consumed during the Olympic events will be entirely of renewable origin, "a first in history", or that 85% of the vehicles used for the Olympic fortnight will run on electricity or hydrogen. In Zhangjiakou, the city 180 km northwest of Beijing where Nordic skiing, biathlon, freestyle skiing and snowboarding events take place, forests of wind turbines can produce 14 million kilowatts per hour. The surrounding mountains are covered with solar panels with an additional capacity of seven million kilowatts / hour while 33,000 hectares of forest and vegetation (47,333 ha in Beijing) have been planted since 2014 to offset carbon emissions. When a preliminary report by the Organizing Committee was published in mid-January, the IOC stressed that "the principles of sustainability had been integrated into all stages of the preparation of the Olympic Games, to minimize the negative impacts of the Games and maximize positive effects”. But neither the IOC's satisfaction nor the measures taken by the organizers reassure the experts. Worse: the superb Big Air event and its 60-meter springboard have been installed in the heart of the former Shougang industrial zone. The steelworks, which was once the country's leading production site and the city's largest employer with up to 65,000 workers, closed in 2010. "Organizing the Olympics in this region is an aberration, it's irresponsible », regrets the geographer Carmen de Jong, from the University of Strasbourg, about the exclusive use of artificial snow and therefore a lot of water to snow Olympic competition sites located in an arid / semi-arid climate, in only 1,500 km southeast of the Gobi Desert. “We are in a region that is already experiencing a water shortage, that is the main problem,” she continues. "According to very conservative calculations, on the ten snow competition sites, at the rate of 10,000 m3 of snow per hectare, it would take about two million m3 of water." "We put the Winter Games where we shouldn't have put the Winter Games," adds Martin Müller, from the Institute of Geography and Sustainability at the University of Lausanne (Unil). “We are going to disturb the ecosystem, a large part of the infrastructure was missing”, continues the academic, who also deplores the absence of “transparency which would make it possible to evaluate these Games there compared to others in environmental matters”. Although he is careful not to present them from the outset as the most environmentally damaging Olympic Games in history, Martin Müller rejects the term “green Games”: “they will not be among the most sustainable Games ( …) the sustainability of the Games has been declining since the 2010s”, he recalls in reference to those of Sochi in 2014 and Pyeongchang in 2018, and even those of Vancouver in 2010. French snowboarder Chloé Trespeuch, sensitive to environmental issues, also said she was "disappointed" with the choice of Beijing to host the Winter Olympics, disputed for the first time on 100% artificial snow. "I'm a little disappointed that they chose a place that is not necessarily suitable for practicing winter sports and that had to be transformed," the snowboardcross specialist told a press conference. . “I hope that we all talk about it, that we realize that it does not necessarily suit us to have such a negative impact on nature and that the next events will have a greater concern for the planet”, she added. The example of Beijing with its climate, certainly lacking in precipitation and snow but with extremely low temperatures, could open a new era, notes Robert Steiger, from the University of Innsbruck. “In the future, the Games may only be awarded to cities with a very cold climate like Beijing, because even without natural snow, from the point of view of the conduct of competitions, there is no problem. in this type of climate” without sudden snowfalls or sudden warming of temperatures, explains the Austrian academic. In a context of scarcity of candidate cities for the organization of the Winter Olympics - two for the 2022 Olympics, Beijing and Almaty - in the face of financial and environmental costs, particularly in Europe,we are “at a crossroads”, recognizes Martin Müller. “Do we accept the principle of only using artificial snow? It is a political question which would increase the number of candidate cities, but also a completely ethical and ecological question”, notes the professor from the University of Lausanne. “The next step is to say: we no longer need the mountains, we can build something artificial, in Qatar I don't know, if we can air-condition football stadiums (for the World Cup-2022). Except for the descent where you need a vertical drop of 800 m, for the rest, it's playable”, he worries. Photo, credits : JONATHAN ERNST / REUTERS #Sport #Winter #china Beijing 2022: In pictures, the Olympics without natural snow in the middle of industrial zones A mountain of criticism is directed at the IOC and the organizers of the Beijing Winter Olympics who pride themselves on having orchestrated “green” and “clean” Games. A white ribbon winding through the middle of arid brush: the image of the alpine ski slopes of the 2022 Olympics captured from its flight to China by the Norwegian Kjetil Jansrud could sum up the environmental "aberration" denounced by experts. This is one of the strong commitments of the organizers of the 2022 Olympics (February 4-20): the Beijing Games will be "green" and "clean", they insist, ensuring that the electricity consumed during the Olympic events will be entirely of renewable origin, "a first in history", or that 85% of the vehicles used for the Olympic fortnight will run on electricity or hydrogen. In Zhangjiakou, the city 180 km northwest of Beijing where Nordic skiing, biathlon, freestyle skiing and snowboarding events take place, forests of wind turbines can produce 14 million kilowatts per hour. The surrounding mountains are covered with solar panels with an additional capacity of seven million kilowatts / hour while 33,000 hectares of forest and vegetation (47,333 ha in Beijing) have been planted since 2014 to offset carbon emissions. When a preliminary report by the Organizing Committee was published in mid-January, the IOC stressed that "the principles of sustainability had been integrated into all stages of the preparation of the Olympic Games, to minimize the negative impacts of the Games and maximize positive effects”. But neither the IOC's satisfaction nor the measures taken by the organizers reassure the experts. Worse: the superb Big Air event and its 60-meter springboard have been installed in the heart of the former Shougang industrial zone. The steelworks, which was once the country's leading production site and the city's largest employer with up to 65,000 workers, closed in 2010. "Organizing the Olympics in this region is an aberration, it's irresponsible », regrets the geographer Carmen de Jong, from the University of Strasbourg, about the exclusive use of artificial snow and therefore a lot of water to snow Olympic competition sites located in an arid / semi-arid climate, in only 1,500 km southeast of the Gobi Desert. “We are in a region that is already experiencing a water shortage, that is the main problem,” she continues. "According to very conservative calculations, on the ten snow competition sites, at the rate of 10,000 m3 of snow per hectare, it would take about two million m3 of water." "We put the Winter Games where we shouldn't have put the Winter Games," adds Martin Müller, from the Institute of Geography and Sustainability at the University of Lausanne (Unil). “We are going to disturb the ecosystem, a large part of the infrastructure was missing”, continues the academic, who also deplores the absence of “transparency which would make it possible to evaluate these Games there compared to others in environmental matters”. Although he is careful not to present them from the outset as the most environmentally damaging Olympic Games in history, Martin Müller rejects the term “green Games”: “they will not be among the most sustainable Games ( …) the sustainability of the Games has been declining since the 2010s”, he recalls in reference to those of Sochi in 2014 and Pyeongchang in 2018, and even those of Vancouver in 2010. French snowboarder Chloé Trespeuch, sensitive to environmental issues, also said she was "disappointed" with the choice of Beijing to host the Winter Olympics, disputed for the first time on 100% artificial snow. "I'm a little disappointed that they chose a place that is not necessarily suitable for practicing winter sports and that had to be transformed," the snowboardcross specialist told a press conference. . “I hope that we all talk about it, that we realize that it does not necessarily suit us to have such a negative impact on nature and that the next events will have a greater concern for the planet”, she added. The example of Beijing with its climate, certainly lacking in precipitation and snow but with extremely low temperatures, could open a new era, notes Robert Steiger, from the University of Innsbruck. “In the future, the Games may only be awarded to cities with a very cold climate like Beijing, because even without natural snow, from the point of view of the conduct of competitions, there is no problem. in this type of climate” without sudden snowfalls or sudden warming of temperatures, explains the Austrian academic. In a context of scarcity of candidate cities for the organization of the Winter Olympics - two for the 2022 Olympics, Beijing and Almaty - in the face of financial and environmental costs, particularly in Europe,we are “at a crossroads”, recognizes Martin Müller. “Do we accept the principle of only using artificial snow? It is a political question which would increase the number of candidate cities, but also a completely ethical and ecological question”, notes the professor from the University of Lausanne. “The next step is to say: we no longer need the mountains, we can build something artificial, in Qatar I don't know, if we can air-condition football stadiums (for the World Cup-2022). Except for the descent where you need a vertical drop of 800 m, for the rest, it's playable”, he worries. Photo, credits : JONATHAN ERNST / REUTERS <a class="loading_bis" rel="external" href="search_tags.php?id=&tag=Sport">#Sport</a> <a class="loading_bis" rel="external" href="search_tags.php?id=&tag=Winter">#Winter</a> <a class="loading_bis" rel="external" href="search_tags.php?id=&tag=china">#china</a> Com_Ely. @Elysa Posts 41 Sponsors 35 Asia Corner @FreelanceGuide Posts 16 Sponsors 23 Yellowstone Grand Teton @Mattu Posts 22 Sponsors 31 Clara Summers @snshin Posts 26 Sponsors 11 Adventures Corp @Adventurers Posts 23 Sponsors 37 Nowa @nowa Posts 6 Sponsors 19 Natha @Natha Posts 13 Sponsors 34 El Gaucho @ElGaucho Posts 38 Sponsors 39 Japanese trip Posts 20 Sponsors 36 Elza @elzasnowqueen Posts 38 Sponsors 37 Beautiful Escapes @beautyEsc Posts 73 Sponsors 54 NY Expands Posts 20 Sponsors 33 ParaNormAl__ Activities_ Posts 29 Sponsors 34 ._S.H.R.W_. @sHrW Posts 27 Sponsors 39 Samia Shiha @Samya Posts 16 Sponsors 6 M.J Singh Posts 16 Sponsors 33 American Dreams @UsDreamer Posts 17 Sponsors 37 Mcqueen @mcqueen Posts 42 Sponsors 43 Cathryn R. DVM @cathyDVM Posts 64 Sponsors 52 Menster @menlifestyle Posts 28 Sponsors 30 The Vertigo @vertigo Posts 28 Sponsors 28 The Journey ☀️ @TheJourney Posts 77 Sponsors 48 Caçador da Amazônia 🐍 @AmazoniaChaser Posts 54 Sponsors 35 Robert Pulka @PulkaRobert Posts 5 Sponsors 10 Beds are burning 🔥 Posts 43 Sponsors 28 Christina Funk @funkme Posts 70 Sponsors 45 Neet__Noi_73 Posts 12 Sponsors 25 American English Quotes @usukquotes Posts 43 Sponsors 33 Fotographia @fotomex357 Posts 70 Sponsors 11 KitKat Posts 26 Sponsors 42 Science 3xplorer @sci3exp Posts 122 Sponsors 53 TravelWorld @travelworld Posts 9 Sponsors 30 Architectural World @ArchiWorld Posts 55 Sponsors 40 Silvio Agostini @Agos Posts 115 Sponsors 45 ChickXs 💎 @ChickXs Posts 10 Sponsors 25 Guerrier Marc-Aurèle @maurele06 Posts 163 Sponsors 57 Jairo Farrell IV @jairoIV Posts 37 Sponsors 45 Marknrise @marknrise Posts 144 Sponsors 60 Tom’s Diary Posts 67 Sponsors 44 DC Comics Fan Page @dcComicsFan Posts 45 Sponsors 38 United States Media News @USmedianews Posts 53 Sponsors 27 Jeff Dup @jeffdupont Posts 54 Sponsors 38 Dyana @Dyana Posts 17 Sponsors 32 Durant JC @durantjc Posts 52 Sponsors 38 Cho yong chul @Choziler Posts 1197 Sponsors 53 The Sport ⚽️ Channel @SportWorldWide Posts 44 Sponsors 34 Durant JC @durantjc Posts 52 Sponsors 38 Jeff Dup @jeffdupont Posts 54 Sponsors 38 Marknrise @marknrise Posts 144 Sponsors 60 Jairo Farrell IV @jairoIV Posts 37 Sponsors 45 Guerrier Marc-Aurèle @maurele06 Posts 163 Sponsors 57 Silvio Agostini @Agos Posts 115 Sponsors 45 Science 3xplorer @sci3exp Posts 122 Sponsors 53 American English Quotes @usukquotes Posts 43 Sponsors 33 Beds are burning 🔥 Posts 43 Sponsors 28 Publication activity : 264 Views 55 Marks 9 Sponsors 264 Sponsored by : The Sport ⚽️ Channel Beijing, China Beijing 2022: In pictures, the Olympics without natural snow in the middle of industrial zones A mountain of criticism is directed at the IOC and the organizers of the Beijing Winter Olympics who pride themselves on having orchestrated “green” and “clean” Games. A white ribbon winding through the middle of arid brush: the image of the alpine ski slopes of the 2022 Olympics captured from its flight to China by the Norwegian Kjetil Jansrud could sum up the environmental "aberration" denounced by experts. This is one of the strong commitments of the organizers of the 2022 Olympics (February 4-20): the Beijing Games will be "green" and "clean", they insist, ensuring that the electricity consumed during the Olympic events will be entirely of renewable origin, "a first in history", or that 85% of the vehicles used for the Olympic fortnight will run on electricity or hydrogen. In Zhangjiakou, the city 180 km northwest of Beijing where Nordic skiing, biathlon, freestyle skiing and snowboarding events take place, forests of wind turbines can produce 14 million kilowatts per hour. The surrounding mountains are covered with solar panels with an additional capacity of seven million kilowatts / hour while 33,000 hectares of forest and vegetation (47,333 ha in Beijing) have been planted since 2014 to offset carbon emissions. When a preliminary report by the Organizing Committee was published in mid-January, the IOC stressed that "the principles of sustainability had been integrated into all stages of the preparation of the Olympic Games, to minimize the negative impacts of the Games and maximize positive effects”. But neither the IOC's satisfaction nor the measures taken by the organizers reassure the experts. Worse: the superb Big Air event and its 60-meter springboard have been installed in the heart of the former Shougang industrial zone. The steelworks, which was once the country's leading production site and the city's largest employer with up to 65,000 workers, closed in 2010. "Organizing the Olympics in this region is an aberration, it's irresponsible », regrets the geographer Carmen de Jong, from the University of Strasbourg, about the exclusive use of artificial snow and therefore a lot of water to snow Olympic competition sites located in an arid / semi-arid climate, in only 1,500 km southeast of the Gobi Desert. “We are in a region that is already experiencing a water shortage, that is the main problem,” she continues. "According to very conservative calculations, on the ten snow competition sites, at the rate of 10,000 m3 of snow per hectare, it would take about two million m3 of water." "We put the Winter Games where we shouldn't have put the Winter Games," adds Martin Müller, from the Institute of Geography and Sustainability at the University of Lausanne (Unil). “We are going to disturb the ecosystem, a large part of the infrastructure was missing”, continues the academic, who also deplores the absence of “transparency which would make it possible to evaluate these Games there compared to others in environmental matters”. Although he is careful not to present them from the outset as the most environmentally damaging Olympic Games in history, Martin Müller rejects the term “green Games”: “they will not be among the most sustainable Games ( …) the sustainability of the Games has been declining since the 2010s”, he recalls in reference to those of Sochi in 2014 and Pyeongchang in 2018, and even those of Vancouver in 2010. French snowboarder Chloé Trespeuch, sensitive to environmental issues, also said she was "disappointed" with the choice of Beijing to host the Winter Olympics, disputed for the first time on 100% artificial snow. "I'm a little disappointed that they chose a place that is not necessarily suitable for practicing winter sports and that had to be transformed," the snowboardcross specialist told a press conference. . “I hope that we all talk about it, that we realize that it does not necessarily suit us to have such a negative impact on nature and that the next events will have a greater concern for the planet”, she added. The example of Beijing with its climate, certainly lacking in precipitation and snow but with extremely low temperatures, could open a new era, notes Robert Steiger, from the University of Innsbruck. “In the future, the Games may only be awarded to cities with a very cold climate like Beijing, because even without natural snow, from the point of view of the conduct of competitions, there is no problem. in this type of climate” without sudden snowfalls or sudden warming of temperatures, explains the Austrian academic. In a context of scarcity of candidate cities for the organization of the Winter Olympics - two for the 2022 Olympics, Beijing and Almaty - in the face of financial and environmental costs, particularly in Europe,we are “at a crossroads”, recognizes Martin Müller. “Do we accept the principle of only using artificial snow? It is a political question which would increase the number of candidate cities, but also a completely ethical and ecological question”, notes the professor from the University of Lausanne. “The next step is to say: we no longer need the mountains, we can build something artificial, in Qatar I don't know, if we can air-condition football stadiums (for the World Cup-2022). Except for the descent where you need a vertical drop of 800 m, for the rest, it's playable”, he worries. Photo, credits : JONATHAN ERNST / REUTERS #Sport #Winter #china Beijing 2022: In pictures, the Olympics without natural snow in the middle of industrial zones A mountain of criticism is directed at the IOC and the organizers of the Beijing Winter Olympics who pride themselves on having orchestrated “green” and “clean” Games. A white ribbon winding through the middle of arid brush: the image of the alpine ski slopes of the 2022 Olympics captured from its flight to China by the Norwegian Kjetil Jansrud could sum up the environmental "aberration" denounced by experts. This is one of the strong commitments of the organizers of the 2022 Olympics (February 4-20): the Beijing Games will be "green" and "clean", they insist, ensuring that the electricity consumed during the Olympic events will be entirely of renewable origin, "a first in history", or that 85% of the vehicles used for the Olympic fortnight will run on electricity or hydrogen. In Zhangjiakou, the city 180 km northwest of Beijing where Nordic skiing, biathlon, freestyle skiing and snowboarding events take place, forests of wind turbines can produce 14 million kilowatts per hour. The surrounding mountains are covered with solar panels with an additional capacity of seven million kilowatts / hour while 33,000 hectares of forest and vegetation (47,333 ha in Beijing) have been planted since 2014 to offset carbon emissions. When a preliminary report by the Organizing Committee was published in mid-January, the IOC stressed that "the principles of sustainability had been integrated into all stages of the preparation of the Olympic Games, to minimize the negative impacts of the Games and maximize positive effects”. But neither the IOC's satisfaction nor the measures taken by the organizers reassure the experts. Worse: the superb Big Air event and its 60-meter springboard have been installed in the heart of the former Shougang industrial zone. The steelworks, which was once the country's leading production site and the city's largest employer with up to 65,000 workers, closed in 2010. "Organizing the Olympics in this region is an aberration, it's irresponsible », regrets the geographer Carmen de Jong, from the University of Strasbourg, about the exclusive use of artificial snow and therefore a lot of water to snow Olympic competition sites located in an arid / semi-arid climate, in only 1,500 km southeast of the Gobi Desert. “We are in a region that is already experiencing a water shortage, that is the main problem,” she continues. "According to very conservative calculations, on the ten snow competition sites, at the rate of 10,000 m3 of snow per hectare, it would take about two million m3 of water." "We put the Winter Games where we shouldn't have put the Winter Games," adds Martin Müller, from the Institute of Geography and Sustainability at the University of Lausanne (Unil). “We are going to disturb the ecosystem, a large part of the infrastructure was missing”, continues the academic, who also deplores the absence of “transparency which would make it possible to evaluate these Games there compared to others in environmental matters”. Although he is careful not to present them from the outset as the most environmentally damaging Olympic Games in history, Martin Müller rejects the term “green Games”: “they will not be among the most sustainable Games ( …) the sustainability of the Games has been declining since the 2010s”, he recalls in reference to those of Sochi in 2014 and Pyeongchang in 2018, and even those of Vancouver in 2010. French snowboarder Chloé Trespeuch, sensitive to environmental issues, also said she was "disappointed" with the choice of Beijing to host the Winter Olympics, disputed for the first time on 100% artificial snow. "I'm a little disappointed that they chose a place that is not necessarily suitable for practicing winter sports and that had to be transformed," the snowboardcross specialist told a press conference. . “I hope that we all talk about it, that we realize that it does not necessarily suit us to have such a negative impact on nature and that the next events will have a greater concern for the planet”, she added. The example of Beijing with its climate, certainly lacking in precipitation and snow but with extremely low temperatures, could open a new era, notes Robert Steiger, from the University of Innsbruck. “In the future, the Games may only be awarded to cities with a very cold climate like Beijing, because even without natural snow, from the point of view of the conduct of competitions, there is no problem. in this type of climate” without sudden snowfalls or sudden warming of temperatures, explains the Austrian academic. In a context of scarcity of candidate cities for the organization of the Winter Olympics - two for the 2022 Olympics, Beijing and Almaty - in the face of financial and environmental costs, particularly in Europe,we are “at a crossroads”, recognizes Martin Müller. “Do we accept the principle of only using artificial snow? It is a political question which would increase the number of candidate cities, but also a completely ethical and ecological question”, notes the professor from the University of Lausanne. “The next step is to say: we no longer need the mountains, we can build something artificial, in Qatar I don't know, if we can air-condition football stadiums (for the World Cup-2022). Except for the descent where you need a vertical drop of 800 m, for the rest, it's playable”, he worries. Photo, credits : JONATHAN ERNST / REUTERS #Sport #Winter #china 9 46 0 0 See the likers See the sponsors 2022-02-09 01:18:38 :